Heard a lot of expert analysis, can be divided into two categories, one is to take care evasive attitude, focusing on the technical aspects of the analysis; category is clearly the position of standing view and analyze the problem. The former group In the public media are more common in the latter category mainly small-scale situations, such as seminars, such as seminars, and so on.
I always thought about the problem in the field of human sciences, the problem has always been the position can not be avoided . was clearly the year Chairman Mao Zedong pointed out: performance of methods, that is abstract or concrete to look at the methodology. Lenin believed that the dialectical analysis of specific issues, is .
recently listened to an expert's speech, for the North Korean nuclear issue (note: not the Korean Peninsula nuclear issue) has combed the origin, are also considered in place; also discussed North Korea's successor, experts believe that North Korean nuclear issue Korean succession issues, as well as Yanping Cheonan island shelling, etc., are to exist in close contact, I also agree with this view.
unacceptable, but there are two aspects. One aspect is that the experts seems to have a deep hatred of the DPRK, talking about the internal affairs of the DPRK is a contempt for used, frivolous manner, giving the feeling that North Korean leader is a rogue, a number of actions the DPRK is the clown's act (with a Some people deal with Chairman Mao Zedong, to treat the newly established three years after the first one to the attitude); a basic conclusion is that North Korea is always dragged down to China. The corresponding is the attitude of the United States, it is objective For China, the DPRK nuclear issue will be facing a disaster of ecological security; China's involvement in this incident go in again and so on. But this is still essentially in that the incident is not related with us.
this the event itself, China is party; our role should not be a mediator, the mediator. We can not be a fool, pretending not to know the Americans play the true meaning behind the words; we took the Americans to the (not against China) script to act. as a man, I naturally can not know the decision-making of our party and the foresight, however, the event evolved to today, we as unacceptable. I think the struggle is the need to talk about compromise But I think a compromise should refer to the details of the process, not on that premise and principle.
dare to struggle and be good at fighting, the people who lead our party to defeat the enemy of the important experience. ghosts is of no use, blindly yield to no avail. who is to have some spirit, a nation, a nation, so, too! for the long-term events related to the Chinese nation, the need for clear-cut stand up, or it may leave a lot of side effects. In This premise, prepare for the worst while working for the best. Chairman Mao Zedong on a well-known contempt for the enemy, the enemy tactically.
flying in today's e-commerce platform:
repeated China's diplomacy Korea the world, have sufficient ability to force the DPRK to give it up sisters are waiting to see: Beijing anti-vice six months 2010-12-17 Comsenz Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment